Re: [asterisk-users] Queue members, URI.

I believe that using the Local/xxx@ctxt format will give you a bit more
flexibility in the dialplan design, as there is an added degree of
indirection. In the end I think this is only marginally costier than the
"raw" channel format (unless you use the /n option) and should provide for
a better laid-out dialplan.

Just my $0.02,
l.

In data Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:30:44 +0200, Thomas Kenyon
<digium@sanguinarius.co.uk> ha scritto:

> Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form:
>
> SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User)
> Over
> Local/<number>@context
>
> ?
>
> I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting
> logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a
> more direct route to calling the party. (and if need be, there is the
> ability in queues to run a script on connection iirc).
>
> TIA for any clarification.
>

--
Home of QueueMetrics - http://queuemetrics.com

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users