[asterisk-users] Chan_SCCP vs. Chan_Skinny

Lacy's response in the thread 'Why does
everyone seem to dislike *now?', has a small
bit that caught my eye.

Chan_Skinny made a lot of progress between 1.2 and
1.4, and even more in the later 1.4.X releases.

I am curious as to which features/functions that
chan_skinny might be lacking compared to chan_sccp.
We (the community) now have a small, but active,
group of volunteers working on the chan_skinny code.

I'm not interested in re-igniting the flame-wars of
the past about these channel drivers, but I would like
to know what else needs to be addressed in chan_skinny
before it users of chan_sccp would consider using it.

Thanks,
Dan

_______________________________________________

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th.

http://www.astricon.net/

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users