>Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
>>>Also be sure that you have a very redundant network configuration.
>>>Too often I see people spend a great deal of time and money to get
>>>redundant servers when their switches, firewalls, routers, etc are not
>>>even capable of handling a failed network element.
>>
>> You can achieve this at the application level.
>
>How do you do that when your single network connection is gone?
Any suggestions on dual-wan routers? We can't get this
stupid Twin-Wan to work:
http://www.xincom.com/twinwan.php
>
>When considering redundancy it is essential that you have no single
>point of failure. Depending on how far you want to go, this means
>right from your dual-box asterisk setup to dual diesel-generators and
>two multi-homed datacenters.
>
>
>
>/Per Jessen, Zürich
>
>--
>http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th.
>
>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
>asterisk-users mailing list
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th.
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
No comments:
Post a Comment