We have multiple installations of this scale and a few with far more
concurrent call paths (250+). In our experience, Asterisk scales
nicely to these levels as long as you are realistic about what you
expect of the server. For instance, we rarely, if ever, convert
signal to TDM. We instead use SIP dial tone from a tier-1 carrier.
Also, if you expect any substantial amount of meetme conferences, you
might want to consider running those on separate hardware. As the
numbers go up, you can peel-apart your switch into functional duties
such as two SIP switching servers, two voicemail servers, one
conferencing server, etc.
Just some ideas. Best of luck to you!
Bryan M. Johns
Shelton | Johns
Office: 678.248.2637
FindMe: 678.229.1809
Support: support@sheltonjohns.com
http://www.sheltonjohns.com
On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Jesse Molina wrote:
>
> Anyone have opinions on how well Asterisk scales to 500-1000
> stations, in
> regards to reliability, system performance, as well as ease of
> management?
>
> Assume relatively low call volume; let's say two public network PRIs
> (47
> DS0s).
>
>
>
> --
> # Jesse Molina
> # The Translational Genomics Research Institute
> # http://www.tgen.org
> # Mail = jmolina@tgen.org
> # Desk = 1.602.343.8459
> # Cell = 1.602.323.7608
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
No comments:
Post a Comment